There are plenty of questionable people that support Trump. Like the white supremacist groups. That was a good deflection though from the Saudis though.
After all the BS allegations of racism in the last year, using it in an argument is the new measure of Godwin's Law.
So your problem with Trumps cabinet members is being too large to prosecute. How the hell is that different than Hillary, Pelosi, Reid, Ryan, McConnel, or any of the other Democrat leaders? They all seem to be made of teflon.
At least with Trump, they're people who have made money rather than taken money through graft.
Regarding Assange's warrant, it has been traced back to the Clinton Foundation via Claire and Todd...unsurprisingly, sex allegations just as Hillary made against Trump.
As for why Trump is in office, your guess is as good as mine...possibly better since I enticed people to vote against Trump by betting for him to win.
If I had to guess, he's there solely to disrupt the globalist agenda. I'm ok with that.
What you call BS racism. I've experienced first hand. Also, I just used it as an example of questionable support. It happens on both sides but pretend everyone who supports trump is somehow "better" is wrong. We made a choice, that is all it boils down to.
Assange warrant is from Sweden. A warrant from Russia called by Putin who actively goes after opponents. Once again no different but actually Sweden hardly prosecutes anyone.
My problem with the cabinet picks. "Hillary is friendly to wall st" puts Goldman Sachs CEO as economic advisor. What I and a lot of others see that for some odd reason many don't is that Trump is doing the exact opposite of what he said. He Used 'marketing' tactics to get your vote and then praise him for the same crap or even less severe than what a Hillary would do. Can you just imagine what you would be saying if Hillary appointed Jamie Dimone as Economoic advisor? It would validate all your arguments but for some reason it's Goldman Sachs and it is great! She talked to bankers and Trump voters had a hissy fit.
My problem is that you have the people that PAID the lobbyists now sitting at the table directly affecting and leading govt policy. These policies can easily influence and increase their bottom line and his too. Do they know how to manage money? Yep. Have they used their wealth and power to benefit people or themselves? Anyways, we've digressed. I don't have as much faith that they will give up their conflicts to help the American people out of the goodness of their hearts, they would've done it already. I don't mind being wrong, I'm skeptical. I question who's in power, not which party is in power. Do you mind being wrong about Trump?
The real crux of this topic is The Who behind it which you keep changing or avoiding but I don't mind the discussion. That is important because it will give us clues as to the motive and if there might be more attacks. If it was a Bernie supporter, it's way different thank Russian backed. We need to know to make informed decisions. All we can do is discuss/debate.
I'm not "against" trump, I just didn't vote for him. I've followed him for years through his real estate, wrestling years, apprentice, Miss Universe, etc. highly respect what he's been able to do. He's an OG "shark". What we do with the info after we find out will be interesting. Unless something absolutely more strange happens Trump will be President. He's known to have more than one interest in mind so I will watch and hope he does well but don't give him a free pass just because he's who you voted for. I would've voted for him if it weren't for a few things. Plenty of my friends did and guess what, were still friends.